Anime_irl

https://www.reddit.com/r/amv/comments/1s65a7y/2026_amv_viewers_choice_awards_final_voting_ends/

2026 AMV Viewers Choice Awards: Final Voting Ends 4/06

Ho'olheyak  (2301x4091)

You’ve poured everything into your startup. Long nights, skipped meals, a vision you truly believe in. Yet, progress is glacial. Customers aren’t sticking, investors aren’t biting, and you’re starting to whisper the scary word: "failure."

But what if failure isn’t the problem? What if your biggest enemy isn’t a flawed product or a bad market, but something far more insidious: boredom?

### Quick Take

*   **Failure often isn't dramatic; it's a slow fade into irrelevance.** Your product isn't *bad*, it's just forgettable.
*   **"Boring" isn't about your industry.** Solving a niche problem can be exciting; a flashy one can be dull if the story isn't there.
*   **It’s about a lack of clear voice, personality, or a compelling *why*.** If you sound like everyone else, you'll blend in.
*   **No strong opinions means no strong connections.** Safe messaging rarely inspires passion.
*   **Focusing solely on features misses the point.** People buy solutions and stories, not just specs.
*   **Your biggest challenge might be breaking through the noise, not building the tech.** And noise suppression requires something *distinct*.
*   **Boring startups don't die of a single wound; they die of indifference.**

### The Dull Truth

Let’s be honest. Most startups aren't failing because their technology is broken, or their idea is fundamentally bad. They're failing because they're utterly unmemorable. They’re beige. They’re background noise. They're *boring*.

This isn't an attack on your product's utility. You might have built the most practical, efficient, problem-solving tool on the planet. But if nobody *cares* enough to give it a second look, what good is it?

What does "boring" actually look like in practice?

*   **Generic Messaging:** "We empower businesses to optimize efficiency through innovative cloud solutions." (Sounds great, means nothing specific.)
*   **No Clear "Why":** You know *what* you do, but can you articulate *why it matters* to someone who isn't already deep in your world?
*   **Solving a Problem Nobody Cares *That Much* About:** Or, more accurately, solving a problem in a way that doesn't *feel* urgent or exciting, even if it objectively saves time/money.
*   **Playing It Safe:** Afraid to alienate potential users, you dilute your message until it appeals to no one in particular.
*   **Feature-itis:** A long list of functionalities without connecting them to a human benefit or emotional desire.

### Why Being Boring Kills Faster Than Being Wrong

Being wrong can be fixed. You pivot, you iterate, you learn. Being boring, however, is a slow, silent killer. If you're boring, no one pays attention long enough for you to even *get* feedback. You’re simply ignored.

A bold, even flawed, startup often gathers more traction and learning opportunities than a perfectly safe, yet dull, one. Why? Because the bold one generates conversation, provokes thought, and dares to inspire.

Here's a quick comparison:

| Boring Startup                                  | Engaging Startup                                   |
| :---------------------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------- |
| Lists features and specs                        | Highlights user benefits and emotional outcomes    |
| Targets "everyone" or "businesses"              | Defines a specific niche, speaks their language    |
| Uses industry buzzwords and vague statements     | Communicates clearly, directly, and uniquely       |
| Avoids taking a stance, plays it safe           | Has a strong point of view, even if controversial  |
| Focuses on what it *is*                         | Focuses on what it *does for you* and *why*        |
| Hopes users will "discover" its value           | Actively educates, inspires, and connects          |

### Injecting Personality: It's Not About Being a Clown

"Personality" doesn't mean you need to slap emojis on your marketing or force quirky jargon. It means having an authentic voice, a clear point of view, and a story that resonates. It’s about being distinctive, not just different.

How do you find that distinct edge? It requires introspection and a willingness to be bold.

1.  **Define Your "Enemy":** What status quo, frustrating process, or dominant competitor are you actively fighting against? Frame your mission in terms of overcoming this adversary. (Example: Salesforce fought against clunky on-premise CRM; Figma fought against siloed design tools.)
2.  **Who Are You *Not* For?:** This is crucial. By explicitly stating who your product *isn't* for, you sharpen your focus on who it *is* for. This isn't about exclusion; it's about clarity. It helps repel the wrong users and attract the right ones fiercely.
3.  **What's Your Distinct Point of View (POV)?:** Beyond "solving a problem," what's your unique take on the problem and its solution? Is it a philosophical difference? A process difference? A cultural difference? Own it.
4.  **How Do You Communicate It?:** Once you have your POV, enemy, and target, how do you *talk* about it? Is it direct, challenging, empathetic, rebellious? Develop a consistent tone of voice across all your touchpoints – website, emails, support.

### The Trade-offs of Being Un-Boring

Let’s be clear: embracing personality and taking a stand isn't a universally easy path. It comes with trade-offs:

*   **You *Will* Alienate Some People:** When you have a strong voice, some will inevitably dislike it or misunderstand it. This is okay. You're building for your tribe, not the entire world.
*   **You Might Be Misunderstood (Initially):** Bold takes can sometimes be misinterpreted. You need to be prepared to clarify and stand firm.
*   **It Requires More Conviction:** It’s easier to hide behind generic language. Being distinct means putting more of yourself, your vision, and your values on the line.

This path is for founders who genuinely want to build something memorable, something that sparks conversation and builds a community, not just a functional tool that fades into the background. If your primary goal is safe, mass appeal without deep connection, then a "boring" approach might feel safer, but it rarely leads to breakthrough success.

### My Setup / Context

I’ve spent years either launching my own side projects (some that soared, many that fizzled) or advising founders in the early stages. The pattern became depressingly clear: the projects that truly struggled weren’t typically bad ideas. They weren't broken. They were just… beige. Their founders were smart, their tech was solid, but their message was a whisper in a hurricane. I've personally made the mistake of trying to appeal to too many people, watering down my core message, and ended up with a product nobody felt strongly about. Learning to embrace a specific angle, even if it feels limiting, has been the biggest game-changer. It's counter-intuitive to think that *less* audience focus can lead to *more* impact, but it consistently proves true.

### What I'd Recommend Instead

So, how do you fix "boring" and inject that vital spark?

*   **Find Your True Niche, Then Lean Into It:** Stop trying to appeal to "everyone." Who specifically *needs* what you offer and *why*? What are their frustrations, hopes, and dreams related to your solution? Speak directly to them.
*   **Craft a Compelling Narrative:** What's the "before" state (painful, frustrating) and the "after" state (empowered, relieved, successful) your product creates? Build a story around this transformation, not just a list of features.
*   **Focus on Emotional Connection, Not Just Features:** How does your product *make people feel*? Does it reduce anxiety? Boost confidence? Save precious time with family? Tap into those deeper motivations.
*   **Be Opinionated (Respectfully):** What do you believe about your industry that others get wrong? What's your unique philosophy? Don't be afraid to articulate it. This is how you differentiate.
*   **Show, Don't Just Tell:** Ditch the abstract language. Show real people using your product. Share case studies that highlight the transformation. Use vivid imagery and concrete examples.
*   **Engage Actively and Personally:** Especially in the early days, connect directly with your users. Listen to their stories, share yours. Build relationships, not just a user base. This human connection is inherently un-boring.

The graveyard of startups isn't filled with failed ideas, but with forgotten ones. Don't be afraid to be wrong. Be afraid to be ignored. Find your voice, embrace your uniqueness, and give your startup the personality it needs to truly shine.

Your Startup Isn’t Failing — It’s Just Boring

We bought into the dream. The smart home nirvana where lights adjust to your mood, coffee brews itself, and the thermostat *knows* you're coming home. We invested in every sensor, switch, and hub. We spent hours scripting routines, linking platforms, and debugging. And after all that? We mostly just automated frustration. Turns out, there's one thing our smart home systems consistently lack: common sense.

**Quick Take**

*   **Over-automation is a trap.** It often adds complexity, not convenience.
*   **Context is king.** Automated rules struggle with human nuance and unexpected situations.
*   **Start small, solve specific problems.** Don't try to automate everything at once.
*   **Manual overrides are non-negotiable.** You *must* be able to easily bypass any automation.
*   **The "why" matters more than the "what if."** Focus on real pain points.
*   **Maintenance debt is real.** Smart homes demand ongoing attention.
*   **The human element is invaluable.** Intuition and quick adjustments are hard to code.
*   **Simplicity wins.** A few reliable automations beat a hundred flaky ones.

## My Setup / Context

My journey into home automation started innocently enough about five years ago. I was captivated by the idea of a truly "smart" home – one that anticipated needs, saved energy, and just *worked* in the background. My setup grew from a few smart bulbs to a sprawling network encompassing almost every room.

We're talking:
*   **Lighting:** Dozens of smart bulbs, light switches, and dimmer modules across the house.
*   **Climate:** A learning thermostat integrated with temperature sensors in multiple zones.
*   **Security:** Door/window sensors, motion detectors, cameras, and smart locks.
*   **Entertainment:** Smart TVs, soundbars, and voice assistants linked to media playback.
*   **Blinds:** Motorized shades on several windows.
*   **Small appliances:** Smart plugs for coffee makers, fans, and humidifiers.

I dabbled with a couple of major brand ecosystems before settling on a more open-source hub as the central brain, trying to bring everything under one roof. The initial investment in hardware and the countless hours spent configuring was driven by pure enthusiasm and the promise of a seamless future.

## Where Common Sense Went Missing

The promise of a smart home often overshadows the messy reality of living in one. Our greatest misstep wasn't in choosing the wrong tech, but in assuming the tech could replace basic human judgment.

### The "If This Then That" Trap

Most automations are based on simple logic: *If X happens, then do Y*. This works great in controlled environments. Houses, with people and pets, are anything but.

Here's where my "smart" home routinely fell flat:

1.  **Motion-triggered lights:** Sounds brilliant, right? Walk into a room, lights come on. Perfect. Until you're sitting still, reading a book, or watching a movie, and the lights abruptly plunge you into darkness because you haven't moved enough in five minutes. Or your cat strolls past the sensor, triggering the bathroom light at 3 AM. The system lacks the common sense to know if the room is *occupied* or just has *motion*.
2.  **Learning thermostats:** These claim to learn your schedule and preferences. Mine "learned" to crank the AC when I was consistently working from home. Great, until I went on vacation, and it kept cooling an empty house. Or when guests stayed over, and it stubbornly stuck to *my* learned schedule, ignoring their comfort. It had data, but no understanding of an altered routine.
3.  **Sunrise/Sunset triggered blinds:** An automation to open bedroom blinds at sunrise feels luxurious. Until you realize sunrise changes throughout the year, sometimes clashing with a desired lie-in. Or worse, it opens them wide just as you're on a video call, bathing your face in harsh light. The system doesn't know if you're sleeping, working, or just prefer privacy.
4.  **Presence-based door locks:** Lock the door when everyone leaves, unlock when someone returns. Fantastic. Except when your phone dies, or a child forgets their device, or a repair person needs entry when you're just down the street. It only understands "device presence," not "human intent."

The issue isn't the technology's capability; it's the inability to bake in the complex, often subconscious, context that humans use every second.

### The "Too Many Cooks" Problem

When multiple systems or people have control, things get messy. My central hub might want to turn off the living room lights because it's past bedtime, but my voice assistant just heard me say "Turn on all lights" because I dropped something. Conflict. The system doesn't know which command takes precedence based on the immediate situation.

Then there's the partner acceptance factor. "Why did the kitchen light just turn off on me?" "The blinds just closed in the middle of my meeting!" If the automation frustrates others in the household, it's a net negative, no matter how clever you think it is. Common sense dictates a system should make *everyone's* life easier, not just the primary configurator.

### Maintenance Debt

Every smart device is another device that needs power, updates, and occasional troubleshooting. Batteries die without warning. Firmware updates break integrations. Wi-Fi drops, taking half your house offline. Suddenly, what was supposed to save time becomes a new, unpaid technical support role. The mental overhead of maintaining this complex web often outweighs the marginal gains.

## Real-World Tradeoffs

Our experience highlighted some stark realities:

| Aspect         | The Dream (Marketing)           | The Reality (Experience)        |
|----------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| **Lighting**   | Seamless, adaptive, mood-setting | Randomly turns off, delayed, confusing, causes arguments |
| **Thermostat** | Learns preferences, saves energy | Jumps temps, ignores actual comfort, adds stress when guests visit |
| **Security**   | Proactive, instant alerts        | False alarms, annoying notifications, misses real threats due to complexity |
| **Effort**     | Effortless, saves time           | Constant tweaking, troubleshooting, adds a new mental load |
| **Reliability**| Always works, predictable        | Fragile, dependent on internet, batteries, firmware, sometimes just "stops" |

## What I'd Do Differently

Looking back, here’s how I’d approach automation today, leaning heavily on lessons learned about common sense:

1.  **Prioritize Pain Points, Not Possibilities:** Don't automate just because you *can*. Identify a real, recurring problem that automation can reliably solve.
    *   **Good examples:** Exterior lights on at sunset, a simple motion sensor turning on a utility closet light, door/window sensors for security alerts, scheduled thermostat adjustments (basic, not "learning").
    *   **Bad examples:** Complex multi-room lighting scenes that require precise timing, presence-based routines for critical functions, systems that control comfort based on a "guess."
2.  **Start Small, Iterate, Validate:** Implement one automation, test it rigorously for a week or two. Does it genuinely improve things? Is it robust? Only then consider expanding.
3.  **Manual Override First:** Every single automated function must have an easy, physical, and intuitive manual override. A light switch that always works, a thermostat you can simply dial up or down, blinds you can pull. If the automation fails, or you simply want to do something different, it should be easier to do it manually than to fight the system.
4.  **Embrace Simplicity:** A dedicated smart plug for the Christmas tree lights is brilliant. Trying to link it into a complex holiday "scene" with synchronized music and fireplace effects is probably overkill and a recipe for frustration.
5.  **Local Control Over Cloud Reliance:** Where possible, choose devices and systems that can function locally without constant internet access or cloud services. This dramatically improves reliability and responsiveness.

## Who This Is For / Not For

**This approach to automation is for you if:**

*   You're a tinkerer who genuinely enjoys the process of setting up and refining systems.
*   You have very specific, consistent pain points that automation can reliably address (e.g., mobility challenges, strict schedules).
*   You understand that "smart" doesn't mean "magic," and are prepared for occasional troubleshooting.
*   Your household members are equally invested or are very patient with your experiments.

**This approach is NOT for you if:**

*   You're looking for a "set it and forget it" solution to instantly simplify your life.
*   You get easily frustrated by technology that doesn't work perfectly every time.
*   Your household has dynamic routines, frequent guests, or diverse preferences.
*   You're on a tight budget, as the time and effort investment can quickly outweigh the financial savings.

What I'd recommend instead, for most people, is to focus on robust single-purpose smart devices that solve a clear problem and have strong manual overrides. Think smart plugs for holiday lights, a reliable smart thermostat you can easily adjust from your phone, or a dedicated security camera system. Don't chase the fully integrated, hyper-automated "smart home" dream unless you have a deep interest in the underlying tech itself.

The goal should be convenience, not complexity. Automation, when applied thoughtfully and with a dose of common sense, can genuinely enhance your life. But when you try to automate *everything*, you often just build yourself a digital house of cards, constantly on the verge of collapsing into annoyance. Sometimes, the smartest thing you can do is just flip a switch.

We Automated Everything Except Common Sense

You’re scrolling. You see something. You click. You scroll more. Another notification pops. You switch tabs. Rinse. Repeat. Five minutes later, you’re lost down a rabbit hole, feeling vaguely unsatisfied, and completely unsure how you got there. Sound familiar?

The internet moves at light speed. Your brain? Not so much. This mismatch isn't just an inconvenience; it's a fundamental problem for your focus, your well-being, and your ability to think deeply. It's time to talk about deliberately slowing things down.

### Quick take

*   **The default state of the internet is overwhelming.** It bombards you faster than you can process.
*   **Your brain isn't built for constant, high-speed input.** It needs time to digest.
*   **This leads to shallow attention, decision fatigue, and often, anxiety.** We mistake input for understanding.
*   **The solution isn't necessarily disconnection, but intentional friction.** Make it harder to get distracted.
*   **Tools can help, but mindset is key.** Design your digital environment for focus, not speed.
*   **You reclaim mental space by choosing slowness.** It’s a deliberate act of resistance.

## The Problem: Cognitive Overload, Instant Gratification

We live in a world where speed is synonymous with efficiency. Gigabit internet. Instant search results. Notifications pinging from every app, device, and platform. But this relentless pace, while impressive technologically, often short-circuits our own cognitive processes. We’re drinking from a firehose, then wondering why we’re perpetually thirsty.

### The "Always On" Trap

Think about your typical morning. Before your first coffee, your phone probably offered you a dozen headlines, five work emails, and three social media updates. By 9 AM, you’ve consumed more information than someone a century ago might have in a week. Your brain attempts to keep up, scanning, filtering, reacting. But this constant input stream leaves little room for reflection, synthesis, or genuine insight. We mistake information *access* for information *processing*. The result? A mind that feels busy but rarely feels productive.

### The Cost of Speed

The hidden cost of this warp-speed digital life is profound. I used to find myself opening a browser for one specific task – check a definition, look up an address – and within minutes, be six tabs deep, scrolling through unrelated articles, completely having forgotten my original intention. This isn't just wasted time; it's a constant drain on your mental energy. Each click, each new piece of information, demands a micro-decision. Over a day, these thousands of tiny decisions add up to significant decision fatigue. Our focus becomes fragmented, our attention span shrinks, and the capacity for deep work—the kind that truly moves the needle—evaporates.

## My Setup / Context

To give you some perspective, my work involves a lot of writing, research, and collaborative document editing. I have a fiber internet connection at home (think 500 Mbps download, 200 Mbps upload), so speed is never an issue. My primary devices are a MacBook Pro and an iPhone, both capable of doing essentially anything instantly. I used to operate with every notification on, multiple browser windows open, and the constant urge to "just check" something. My "fast habits" meant I spent more time *managing* information than *using* it. This experience, feeling perpetually behind despite having all the tools, is what pushed me to fundamentally rethink my approach to digital speed.

## Strategies for Deliberate Slowness

This isn't about ditching the internet entirely; it's about reclaiming your brain's pace in a hyper-fast world.

### Building Friction Back In

Sometimes, the best solution is to simply make it harder to fall into the rabbit hole.

1.  **Scheduled "Internet Breaks":** Instead of constant connectivity, block out specific times for "internet work." This includes email, social media, news, and even non-critical research. Outside these windows, the internet is for *output* only (writing, coding, focused work).
2.  **Physical Barriers:** My phone often lives in another room, or at least out of arm's reach while I’m doing focused work on my laptop. Out of sight, out of mind. Even turning it upside down can make a difference.
3.  **App Blockers / Website Filters:** Tools exist that allow you to block distracting websites or apps for set periods. I use one during my writing blocks. It’s not about willpower; it’s about architecting an environment where willpower isn’t constantly tested.
4.  **Analog First:** Before opening a browser for research, I grab a notebook. Outline ideas, jot down questions, map out my thoughts. This pre-computation helps refine what I *actually* need from the internet, making my searches more targeted and less prone to distraction.
5.  **Single-Tasking Rules:** When I'm online for a specific task, only that tab and related documents are open. No side quests. No "just checking Twitter." This takes conscious effort but pays off immensely in focus.

### Choosing Tools Wisely

Not all digital tools are created equal when it comes to fostering focus. Some inherently slow you down (in a good way).

*   **E-readers vs. Tablets:** An e-reader like a Kindle is designed for reading, and little else. A tablet, with its full web browser, app store, and notification capabilities, is a distraction machine masquerading as a productivity tool.
*   **Minimalist Apps:** Seek out apps that do one thing well, without endless features, notifications, or social feeds. Text editors that strip away formatting options, simple note-taking tools, or calendar apps that just show your schedule.
*   **"Dumb" Phones (or Smart Phones Set Dumb):** Many people find relief in using a basic phone for calls and texts, or by stripping their smartphone of all but essential apps, turning off notifications, and using grayscale mode.
*   **Curated Feeds (RSS):** Instead of letting algorithms dictate what you see, use an RSS reader to subscribe only to the blogs and news sources you truly value. You pull information when you want it, rather than it being pushed to you constantly.
*   **Dedicated Devices:** For deep creative work, consider a device specifically for that purpose, ideally with no internet connection at all. An old laptop configured purely for writing, for example.

## Tradeoffs and Who This Is For

Embracing slowness isn't without its challenges.

### The Downside of Disconnecting

*   **Potential for Isolation:** You might miss out on real-time news, social conversations, or urgent updates. There’s a balance to strike between focus and staying informed.
*   **Initial Productivity Hit:** Changing habits is hard. The first few days or weeks of deliberately slowing down can feel frustratingly inefficient as you retrain your brain.
*   **Learning Curve for New Habits:** It takes effort and consistency to establish new routines and resist old temptations. The urge to "just check" is powerful.
*   **Not for Everyone:** Certain roles (e.g., social media managers, emergency responders) require constant, high-speed monitoring. This advice is for those who *can* dictate their digital boundaries.

### Who Benefits Most

This approach is highly beneficial for:

*   **Knowledge Workers & Creatives:** Writers, designers, programmers, researchers – anyone whose job requires deep, sustained concentration.
*   **Students:** To improve learning, retention, and the quality of academic output.
*   **Anyone Feeling Overwhelmed:** If you constantly feel behind, anxious, or like your brain is "full."
*   **Individuals Struggling with Focus:** If you notice your attention span shrinking or find yourself easily distracted from important tasks.

## Comparison: Fast vs. Slow Internet Habits

| Aspect                | Fast Habits (Problem)                                  | Slow Habits (Solution)                                   |
| :-------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Information Consumption** | Endless scrolling, notification-driven                   | Curated feeds, scheduled checks, intentional pull        |
| **Decision Making**   | Impulsive clicks, reactive responses                   | Deliberate choices, reflective thought before action     |
| **Focus**             | Fragmented attention, shallow engagement               | Sustained concentration, deep work blocks                |
| **Tool Use**          | Multi-tasking, all-in-one apps, constant switching     | Single-tasking, specialized tools, dedicated periods     |
| **Mental State**      | Overwhelmed, anxious, perpetually busy                  | Calm, clear, engaged, genuinely productive               |

## What I’d Recommend Instead

Instead of letting the internet pull you along at its frantic pace, push back. Start small. Pick one digital habit you want to slow down this week. Maybe it's checking email only twice a day. Maybe it's leaving your phone outside the bedroom. Instead of letting the algorithm choose your next piece of content, actively seek out what you *intend* to consume. Think of it as a mental diet, where you're mindful of every byte you ingest.

Don't see the internet as a default. See it as a powerful tool to be used with precision and purpose. The goal isn't to be less connected, but to be more intentionally connected, ultimately giving your brain the breathing room it desperately needs to truly thrive.

The Internet Is Faster Than Your Brain (And That’s a Problem)

Killing fields by John Wigley

The Rose Garden - Ferdinand Keller (1908)

My version of goddess Melinoe, bringer of madness and nightmares

https://v.redd.it/pf38a5i5xwrg1/CMAF_480.mp4

Dude seem Lonely

https://v.redd.it/jg02s0ebvxrg1/CMAF_1080.mp4

Don't touch it

https://v.redd.it/b27sdlpb0wrg1/CMAF_480.mp4

Consultant—Client

Happy GI on his way to pass out candy rations to his buddies, ca 1944.

A wedding the 70s

Yukio Ozaki, 94-year-old Japanese politician, after learning of his first electoral defeat in his 26th election, 1953

Speaker of Iran’s Parliament, Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, has said that the United States, despite public statements of willingness to negotiate, is secretly planning...

https://caliber.az/en/post/iran-ready-to-face-us-ground-invasion-top-lawmaker-says

Iran ready to face US ground invasion, top lawmaker says | Caliber.Az

An important U.S. Air Force E-3 Sentry AWACS plane was damaged in a March 27 Iranian missile and drone attackon a base in Saudi Arabia.

https://www.airandspaceforces.com/key-e-3-awacs-aircraft-damaged-iranian-attack-saudi-air-base/

Key USAF E-3 AWACS Aircraft Damaged in Iranian Attack

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/28/trump-iran-ground-troops-marines/

Pentagon prepares for weeks of ground operations in Iran

Five detained in Tel Aviv and six in Haifa, while about 250 gathered near the prime minister’s residence in Jerusalem, as protests led by former lawmakers drew support from dozens of civil society groups

https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hknn7qsjbx

Thousands protest across Israel calling to end war

"The first priority is weapons — their production, exchange of experience," President Volodymyr Zelensky said in Qatar.

https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-secures-10-year-defense-deals-with-gulf-states-amid-iran-war/

Tech, News, History, Wallpapers & Anime — NoShitBlog

Your Startup Isn’t Failing — It’s Just Boring

NEWS >

Iran ready to face US ground invasion, top lawmaker says | Caliber.Az

Key USAF E-3 AWACS Aircraft Damaged in Iranian Attack

Pentagon prepares for weeks of ground operations in Iran

Thousands protest across Israel calling to end war

Ukraine securing 10-year defense deals with Gulf states amid Iran war

Naval group with 3,500 Marines enters CENTCOM region

BLOG >

Your Startup Isn’t Failing — It’s Just Boring

We Automated Everything Except Common Sense

The Internet Is Faster Than Your Brain (And That’s a Problem)

HISTORY >

Happy GI on his way to pass out candy rations to his buddies, ca 1944.

A wedding the 70s

Yukio Ozaki, 94-year-old Japanese politician, after learning of his first electoral defeat in his 26th election, 1953

WALLPAPERS >

Mount Everest

Vicente Romero Redondo (1956-) - Siesta

Kitchen with a bright yellow ceiling in a 1900s Victorian residence, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, England

FUNNY >

Dude seem Lonely

Don't touch it

Consultant—Client

ANIME >

Anime_irl

2026 AMV Viewers Choice Awards: Final Voting Ends 4/06

Ho'olheyak (2301x4091)

CREEP >

Killing fields by John Wigley

The Rose Garden - Ferdinand Keller (1908)

My version of goddess Melinoe, bringer of madness and nightmares